Internet-versus group-administered cognitive behaviour therapy for panic disorder in a psychiatric setting: a randomised trial
© Bergström et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 6 February 2010
Accepted: 2 July 2010
Published: 2 July 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Feb 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gavin Andrews|
|27 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nickolai Titov|
|9 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Bergström|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Bergström|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Bergström|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Jul 2010||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jul 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-10-54|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.