Do general practitioners and psychiatrists agree about defining cure from depression? The DEsCRIBE™ survey
© Demyttenaere et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 26 June 2011
Accepted: 14 October 2011
Published: 14 October 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Papakostas|
|21 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roland Mergl|
|1 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniela Krause|
|28 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - koen demyttenaere|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Oct 2011||Editorially accepted|
|14 Oct 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-11-169|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.