Effectiveness of a self-help manual on the promotion of resilience in individuals with depression in Thailand: a randomised controlled trial
© Songprakun and McCann; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 August 2011
Accepted: 16 February 2012
Published: 16 February 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Terence McCann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fu Keung Wong|
|21 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Bower|
|30 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Terence McCann|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fu Keung Wong|
|30 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Bower|
|25 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Terence McCann|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Feb 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Feb 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.