Somatic symptoms beyond those generally associated with a whiplash injury are increased in self-reported chronic whiplash. A population-based cross sectional study: the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK)
© Myrtveit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 September 2011
Accepted: 14 August 2012
Published: 31 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Ferrari|
|9 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther Williamson|
|15 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Freeman|
|2 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Arnstein Mykletun|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Ferrari|
|17 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Freeman|
|25 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther Williamson|
|9 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Arnstein Mykletun|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|31 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-129|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.