Quality of care for major depression and its determinants: a multilevel analysis
© Duhoux et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 23 March 2012
Accepted: 9 August 2012
Published: 17 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Arnaud Duhoux|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marijn Alice Prins|
|23 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isobel Cameron|
|2 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Arnaud Duhoux|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|17 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-142|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.