Quetiapine monotherapy in acute phase for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials
© Maneeton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 February 2012
Accepted: 20 September 2012
Published: 27 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - benchalak maneeton|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alessandro Serretti|
|31 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Massimo Mauri|
|6 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - benchalak maneeton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alessandro Serretti|
|11 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Massimo Mauri|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|27 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-160|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.