A rapid screening tool for psychological distress in children 3–6years old: results of a validation study
© Marquer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 September 2011
Accepted: 10 October 2012
Published: 16 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Jordans|
|27 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Schauer|
|27 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline Marquer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Schauer|
|26 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Jordans|
|29 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline Marquer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Jordans|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-170|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.