Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The characteristics of serious suicide attempters in Japanese adolescents- comparison study between adolescents and adults

  • Yoshitaka Kawashima1,
  • Takao Ito1,
  • Ryuichiro Narishige1,
  • Takuya Saito1 and
  • Yoshiro Okubo1Email author
BMC Psychiatry201212:191

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-191

Received: 21 April 2012

Accepted: 2 October 2012

Published: 8 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Toshihiko Matsumoto
21 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yamashita Hiroshi
2 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - L Cailhol
28 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yoshitaka Kawashima
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yamashita Hiroshi
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
2 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-12-191

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Nippon Medical School

Advertisement