The generalizability of psychotherapy efficacy trials in major depressive disorder: an analysis of the influence of patient selection in efficacy trials on symptom outcome in daily practice
- Rosalind van der Lem†1, 4Email author,
- Wouter WH de Wever1,
- Nic JA van der Wee1, 2,
- Tineke van Veen1,
- Pim Cuijpers3 and
- Frans G Zitman1
© van der Lem et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 29 February 2012
Accepted: 25 October 2012
Published: 8 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman|
|13 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulf Malm|
|10 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Rosalind van der Lem|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|8 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-192|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.