Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Long-term healthcare costs and functional outcomes associated with lack of remission in schizophrenia: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational study

  • Virginia S Haynes1Email author,
  • Baojin Zhu1,
  • Virginia L Stauffer1,
  • Bruce J Kinon1,
  • Michael D Stensland2,
  • Lei Xu1 and
  • Haya Ascher-Svanum1
BMC Psychiatry201212:222

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-222

Received: 22 August 2012

Accepted: 29 November 2012

Published: 5 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
22 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelly Buck
10 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Opler
16 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Michael Stensland
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-12-222

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center
Agile Outcomes Research, Inc