Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Adolescent self-harm and suicidal thoughts in the ALSPAC cohort: a self-report survey in England

  • Judi Kidger1Email author,
  • Jon Heron1,
  • Glyn Lewis1,
  • Jonathan Evans1 and
  • David Gunnell1
BMC Psychiatry201212:69

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-69

Received: 5 January 2012

Accepted: 12 June 2012

Published: 27 June 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
5 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Yip
10 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Siri Thoresen
2 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Judi Kidger
Resubmission - Version 3
2 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Siri Thoresen
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
27 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-12-69

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol