Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Perceived causes of severe mental disturbance and preferred interventions by the Borana semi-nomadic population in southern Ethiopia: a qualitative study

BMC Psychiatry201212:79

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-79

Received: 1 November 2011

Accepted: 12 July 2012

Published: 12 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert David Schweitzer
1 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Valerie Demarinis
9 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Rees
30 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Solomon Teferra
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Solomon Teferra
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Solomon Teferra
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
12 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-12-79

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University
(2)
Division of Psychiatry, Umeå University

Advertisement