The association between online gaming, social phobia, and depression: an internet survey
© Wei et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 October 2011
Accepted: 16 July 2012
Published: 28 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Han-Ting Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dave Hayes|
|6 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yasser Khazaal|
|7 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bengt Arnetz|
|8 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Han-Ting Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Han-Ting Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|24 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dave Hayes|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|16 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-92|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.