Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Depressive symptoms in first episode psychosis: a one-year follow-up study

  • Nasrettin Sönmez1, 2Email author,
  • Kristin Lie Romm1,
  • Ole A Andreasssen2,
  • Ingrid Melle2 and
  • Jan Ivar Røssberg1, 2
BMC Psychiatry201313:106

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-106

Received: 18 January 2013

Accepted: 16 March 2013

Published: 5 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
26 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tania Lecomte
16 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nasrettin Sönmez
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
16 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-13-106

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Oslo University Hospital, (TIPS Sor Ost) Centre of Competence for Early Intervention in Psychosis
(2)
KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction and Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo

Advertisement