Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Is computerised CBT really helpful for adult depression?-A meta-analytic re-evaluation of CCBT for adult depression in terms of clinical implementation and methodological validity

  • Mirai So1Email author,
  • Sosei Yamaguchi2,
  • Sora Hashimoto3,
  • Mitsuhiro Sado4,
  • Toshi A Furukawa5 and
  • Paul McCrone6
BMC Psychiatry201313:113

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-113

Received: 15 October 2012

Accepted: 15 March 2013

Published: 15 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanna Leaviss
12 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luigi Rocco Chiri
3 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Mirai So
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luigi Rocco Chiri
20 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanna Leaviss
23 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Mirai So
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luigi Rocco Chiri
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
15 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-13-113

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK, Weston Education Centre
(2)
Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, National Institute of Mental Health, National Centre of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan
(3)
Department of Psychology and Humanities, College of Sociology, Edogawa University
(4)
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine
(5)
Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior/Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho
(6)
Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health (CEMPH) P024, Institute of Psychiatry King’s College London

Advertisement