Distinctive emotional responses of clinicians to suicide-attempting patients - a comparative study
- Zimri S Yaseen†1Email author,
- Jessica Briggs†1,
- Irina Kopeykina1,
- Kali M Orchard1,
- Jessica Silberlicht1,
- Hetal Bhingradia1 and
- Igor I Galynker1
© Yaseen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 3 June 2013
Accepted: 18 September 2013
Published: 22 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Batterham|
|30 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evan Kleiman|
|28 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Zimri Yaseen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evan Kleiman|
|6 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Zimri Yaseen|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|22 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-13-230|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.