Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Working alliance and its relationship to outcomes in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of antipsychotic medication

BMC Psychiatry201313:28

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-28

Received: 25 July 2012

Accepted: 14 January 2013

Published: 15 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Til Wykes
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
10 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louanne Davis
26 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Til Wykes
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
26 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Til Wykes
Resubmission - Version 7
26 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
23 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
29 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louanne Davis
8 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Til Wykes
Resubmission - Version 8
8 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
14 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-13-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
NIHR MHRN and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
(2)
Service User Research Enterprise, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
(3)
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
(4)
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London

Advertisement