Developmental trauma disorder: pros and cons of including formal criteria in the psychiatric diagnostic systems
© Schmid et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 4 January 2012
Accepted: 29 November 2012
Published: 3 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Roberts|
|20 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carryl Navalta|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carryl Navalta|
|23 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marc Schmid|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-13-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.