Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Developmental trauma disorder: pros and cons of including formal criteria in the psychiatric diagnostic systems

BMC Psychiatry201313:3

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-3

Received: 4 January 2012

Accepted: 29 November 2012

Published: 3 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
4 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Roberts
20 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carryl Navalta
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carryl Navalta
23 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Marc Schmid
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
3 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-13-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of child and adolescent psychiatry University Basel
Center of clinical psychology and rehabilitation University Bremen
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm