Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Defining mental illnesses: can values and objectivity get along?

BMC Psychiatry201313:346

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-346

Received: 3 June 2013

Accepted: 20 December 2013

Published: 24 December 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jun 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sadler
5 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Appelbaum
13 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Zachar
2 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Dominic Sisti
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sadler
30 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Zachar
9 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Dominic Sisti
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
24 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-13-346

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
(2)
Harvard Medical School
(3)
Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University

Advertisement