HIV-infected mental health patients: characteristics and comparison with HIV-infected patients from the general population and non-infected mental health patients
© Schadé et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 April 2012
Accepted: 9 January 2013
Published: 23 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Annemiek Schadé|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allison Webel|
|13 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary Mackesy-Amiti|
|2 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Annemiek Schadé|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allison Webel|
|26 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary Mackesy-Amiti|
|2 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Annemiek Schadé|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-13-35|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.