Web-based guided self-help for employees with depressive symptoms (Happy@Work): design of a randomized controlled trial
© Geraedts et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 February 2012
Accepted: 31 January 2013
Published: 18 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Geraedts|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Geraedts|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anette Kersting|
|9 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jordan Silberman|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bo Netterstrøm|
|28 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Geraedts|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jordan Silberman|
|18 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bo Netterstrøm|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|18 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-13-61|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.