Current practices in managing acutely disturbed patients at three hospitals in Rio de Janeiro-Brazil: a prevalence study
© Huf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 25 October 2001
Accepted: 22 January 2002
Published: 22 January 2002
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Oct 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Dec 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lyn Pilowsky|
|3 Jan 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Clive E Adams|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jan 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jan 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lyn Pilowsky|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Jan 2002||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jan 2002||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-2-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.