Cross-sectional survey of users of Internet depression communities
© Powell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 02 September 2003
Accepted: 10 December 2003
Published: 10 December 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Sep 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Klemm|
|29 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Griffiths|
|27 Oct 2003||Author responded||Author comments - John Powell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Oct 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Klemm|
|26 Nov 2003||Author responded||Author comments - John Powell|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Nov 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Dec 2003||Author responded||Author comments - John Powell|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Dec 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Dec 2003||Editorially accepted|
|10 Dec 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-3-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.