Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Two cases of "cannabis acute psychosis" following the administration of oral cannabis

  • Bernard Favrat1Email author,
  • Annick Ménétrey2,
  • Marc Augsburger2,
  • Laura E Rothuizen3,
  • Monique Appenzeller3,
  • Thierry Buclin3,
  • Marie Pin1,
  • Patrice Mangin2 and
  • Christian Giroud2
BMC Psychiatry20055:17

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-5-17

Received: 21 January 2005

Accepted: 01 April 2005

Published: 01 April 2005

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
21 Jan 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Krystal
14 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hinderk M. Emrich
21 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Bernard Favrat
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Apr 2005 Editorially accepted
1 Apr 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-5-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Unité de Médecine du Trafic, Institut Universitaire de Médecine Légale (IUML)
Laboratoire de Toxicologie et Chimie Forensiques (LTCF), Institut Universitaire de Médecine Légale (IUML)
Division de pharmacologie et toxicologie cliniques, CHUV