Mixed states vs. pure mania in the french sample of the EMBLEM study: results at baseline and 24 months – European mania in bipolar longitudinal evaluation of medication
© Azorin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 29 October 2008
Accepted: 07 June 2009
Published: 07 June 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Oct 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Dilsaver|
|22 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Bland|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Stephanie Gerard|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|3 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 May 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Stephanie Gerard|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|20 May 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|3 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Stephanie Gerard|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|3 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|7 Jun 2009||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jun 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-9-33|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.