Skip to main content

Table 3 Study instruments by perspective and measurement point.

From: Clinical Decision Making and Outcome in Routine Care for People with Severe Mental Illness (CEDAR): Study protocol

Variable Instrument Perspec-tive Measurement point
    t0 t1-t5 t6
Clinical characteristics (diagnosis, illness duration) Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV on the basis of case notes (SCID [45, 46]) PR   
Sociodemographic status, service use Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI-EU [49]) PR  
Illness severity Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG [47]) PR  
CDM Style Clinical Decision Making Style Scale (CDMS CEDAR) P/S  
CDM in Routine Care Clinical Decision Making in Routine Care Scale (CDRC CEDAR) P/S
CDM Involvement and Satisfaction Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction Scale (CDIS CEDAR) P/S
Needs Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS [48, 49]) P
Quality of Life Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA[50]) P  
Therapeutic relationship Helping Alliance Scale (HAS [51]) P/S
Symptomatic impairment Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2 [52]) P  
  Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS [53]) S  
Functioning Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF [54]) S  
Recovery Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI-30 [55]) P  
  1. Notes. CDM: Clinical Decision Making; P: Patient; S: Staff; P/S: Patient and Staff; PR: Patient, researcher-led, t0: baseline assessment; t1-t5: intermediate assessments (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 months); t6: final assessment (12 months).