Skip to main content

Table 3 Study instruments by perspective and measurement point.

From: Clinical Decision Making and Outcome in Routine Care for People with Severe Mental Illness (CEDAR): Study protocol

Variable

Instrument

Perspec-tive

Measurement point

   

t0

t1-t5

t6

Clinical characteristics (diagnosis, illness duration)

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV on the basis of case notes (SCID [45, 46])

PR

  

Sociodemographic status, service use

Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI-EU [49])

PR

 

Illness severity

Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG [47])

PR

 

CDM Style

Clinical Decision Making Style Scale (CDMS CEDAR)

P/S

 

CDM in Routine Care

Clinical Decision Making in Routine Care Scale (CDRC CEDAR)

P/S

CDM Involvement and Satisfaction

Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction Scale (CDIS CEDAR)

P/S

Needs

Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS [48, 49])

P

Quality of Life

Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA[50])

P

 

Therapeutic relationship

Helping Alliance Scale (HAS [51])

P/S

Symptomatic impairment

Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2 [52])

P

 

 

Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS [53])

S

 

Functioning

Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF [54])

S

 

Recovery

Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI-30 [55])

P

 

  1. Notes. CDM: Clinical Decision Making; P: Patient; S: Staff; P/S: Patient and Staff; PR: Patient, researcher-led, t0: baseline assessment; t1-t5: intermediate assessments (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 months); t6: final assessment (12 months).