This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Seeking help for depression from family and friends: A qualitative analysis of perceived advantages and disadvantages
© Griffiths et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 15 October 2010
Accepted: 15 December 2011
Published: 15 December 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Crosland|
|4 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Debra Rickwood|
|14 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Dimity Crisp|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Crosland|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Dimity Crisp|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Dec 2011||Editorially accepted|
|15 Dec 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-11-196|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.