Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Efficacy of exposure versus cognitive therapy in anxiety disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Roy-Byrne
31 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Powers
13 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Dennis Ougrin
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Powers
10 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Roy-Byrne
26 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Dennis Ougrin
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Dennis Ougrin
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Dennis Ougrin
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-11-200

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement