Skip to main content

Table 6 Matching of rating for each item and eventual placement.

From: The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study

 

RATING

 
     

Total

 

0

1

2

3-4

(n = 316)

TS1: serious violence

188/188 (100%)

54/85 (65%)

12/15 (80%)

22/28 (79%)

276 (87%)

TS2: serious self harm

267/267 (100%)

12/34 (35%)

7/7 (100%)

6/8 (75%)

292 (92%)

TS3: immediacy of violence risk

199/199 (100%)

9/23 (39%)

47/75 (63%)

16/19 (84%)

271 (86%)

TS4: immediacy of self harm risk

294/294 (100%)

3/9 (33%)

8/10 (80%)

3/3 (100%)

308 (97%)

TS5: specialist forensic need

214/214 (100%)

47/54 (87%)

32/36 (89%)

11/12 (92%)

304 (96%)

TS6: absconding risk

197/197 (100%)

20/37 (54%)

50/62 (81%)

19/20 (95%)

286 (91%)

TS7: preventing access

211/211 (100%)

21/25 (84%)

39/59 (66%)

19/21 (90%)

290 (92%)

TS8: victim sensitivities

228/228 (100%)

15/18 (83%)

12/23 (52%)

32/47 (68%)

289 (91%)

TS9: complex risks

180/180 (100%)

32/63 (51%)

25/36 (69%)

22/37 (59%)

259 (82%)

TS10: institutional behaviour

208/208 (100%)

59/79 (75%)

20/23 (87%)

6/6 (100%)

293 (93%)

TS11: legal procedure

209/209 (100%)

17/20 (85%)

28/38 (74%)

44/49 (90%)

298 (94%)

WEIGHTED MEAN % TOTALS

2398/2398 (100%)

298/447 (65%)

283/381 (74%)

200/250 (80%)

3166/3476 (91%)

  1. For those given each rating of each item (0 = community, 1 = open ward, 2 = PICU, 3 or 4 forensic medium or high secure), the number and percentage placed correctly or at a higher (safer) level of therapeutic security. Note that for those rated '0', any placement in the community or at a higher level is appropriate.