Skip to main content

Table 7 Matching of eventual placements with ratings for each item

From: The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study

  PLACEMENT  
  Community Open ward PICU Medium or high security Total
  N = 216 N = 27 N = 26 N = 47 (n = 316)
TS1: serious violence 184 (85%) 24 (89%) 21 (81%) 47 (100%) 276 (87%)
TS2: serious self harm 194 (90%) 26 (96%) 25 (96%) 47 (100%) 292 (92%)
TS3: immediacy of violence risk 196 (91%) 5 (19%) 23 (88%) 47 (100%) 271 (86%)
TS4: immediacy of self harm risk 208 (96%) 27 (100%) 26 (100%) 47 (100%) 308 (97%)
TS5: specialist forensic need 208 (96%) 27 (100%) 25 (96%) 47 (100%) 307 (97%)
TS6: absconding risk 194 (90%) 19 (70%) 26 (100%) 47 (100%) 286 (91%)
TS7: preventing access 200 (93%) 19 (70%) 24 92%) 47 (100%) 290 (92%)
TS8: victim sensitivities 207 (96%) 19 (70%) 16 62%) 47 (100%) 289 (91%)
TS9: complex risks 180 (83%) 16 (59%) 16 (62%) 47 (100%) 259 (82%)
TS10: institutional behaviour 194 (90%) 26 (96%) 26 (100%) 47 (100%) 293 (93%)
TS11: legal procedure 207 (96%) 18 (67%) 26 (100%) 47 (100%) 298 (94%)
WEIGHTED MEAN % TOTALS 21732 (91%) 208 (68%) 254 (89%) 517 (100%) 3168 (91%)
  1. For each placement, the number and percentage of those allocated to that level of therapeutic security who had ratings for each item indicating that the placement or a lower level of security was appropriate. Note that for those placed in medium or high security (n = 47), any rating of 4 or less is consistent with a safe placement (100%).