Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Translation and validation of the Korean confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Adamis
29 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maarten Menno Jeroen van Eijk
25 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sang-Min Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maarten Menno Jeroen van Eijk
22 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Adamis
2 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sang-Min Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maarten Menno Jeroen van Eijk
21 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Adamis
9 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sang-Min Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
9 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sang-Min Lee
Resubmission - Version 5
20 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 May 2011 Editorially accepted
23 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-11-94

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement