Skip to content


You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Psychiatry

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace

  • Elaine Brohan1Email author,
  • Claire Henderson1,
  • Kay Wheat2,
  • Estelle Malcolm1,
  • Sarah Clement1,
  • Elizabeth A Barley1,
  • Mike Slade1 and
  • Graham Thornicroft1
Contributed equally
BMC Psychiatry201212:11

Received: 6 September 2011

Accepted: 16 February 2012

Published: 16 February 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beate M. Schulze
14 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lilliana Del Busso
24 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elaine Brohan
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
16 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-12-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University, Belgrave Centre