A patient perspective of the impact of medication side effects on adherence: results of a cross-sectional nationwide survey of patients with schizophrenia
© DiBonaventura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 22 September 2011
Accepted: 20 March 2012
Published: 20 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giovanni Abbate-Daga|
|21 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Qun Mai|
|21 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanna Bredski|
|19 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marco DiBonaventura|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Qun Mai|
|8 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giovanni Abbate-Daga|
|8 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanna Bredski|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-12-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.