Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Identifying persistent negative symptoms in first episode psychosis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Martin Lepage
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Young Chul Chung
22 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Svein Friis
28 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rajeev Krishnadas
19 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Martin Lepage
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Svein Friis
6 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rajeev Krishnadas
22 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Young Chul Chung
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-12-224

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement