Skip to content


You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Psychiatry

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of behavioral changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions

  • Irina Georgieva1, 2Email author,
  • Cornelis L Mulder3, 4 and
  • Richard Whittington5
Contributed equally
BMC Psychiatry201212:54

Received: 4 November 2011

Accepted: 30 May 2012

Published: 30 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
4 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mary Johnson
8 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tilman Steinert
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Irina Georgieva
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 May 2012 Editorially accepted
30 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-12-54

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus, MC
Mental Health Center Western North-Brabant
Research Center O3
Department of Psychiatry, Bavo-Europoort and Municipal Health Center Rotterdam
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool & Honorary Research Fellow, Mersey Care NHS Trust