Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reduced P300 amplitude during retrieval on a spatial working memory task in a community sample of adolescents who report psychotic symptoms

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Dec 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kei Mizuno
17 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Negoro Hideki
1 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yusuke Moriguchi
2 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masumi Inagaki
11 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Caroline Rawdon
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kei Mizuno
23 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yusuke Moriguchi
26 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Negoro Hideki
27 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masumi Inagaki
4 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Caroline Rawdon
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yusuke Moriguchi
10 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kei Mizuno
15 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Caroline Rawdon
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kei Mizuno
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
1 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-13-125

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement