Men | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | Change χ2 | df | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 both lagged effects | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.046 | Â | Â | Â |
Model 2 no lagged effect of MHI-5 (no Path A) | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.046 | 16.57ª | 1 | <.0001 |
Model 3 no lagged effect of unemployment (no Path B) | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.0436 | 4.15ª | 1 | =.042 |
Model 4 neither lagged effect | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.043 | Â | Â | Â |
no lagged effect of unemployment: compared to Model 2 | Â | Â | Â | 9.03 | 1 | =.0027 |
no lagged effect of MHI-5: compared to Model 3 | Â | Â | Â | 16.81 | 1 | <.0001 |
Women | ||||||
Model 1 both lagged effects | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.043 | Â | Â | Â |
Model 2 no lagged effect of MHI-5 (no Path A) | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.044 | 38.51ª | 1 | < .0001 |
Model 3 no lagged effect of unemployment (no Path B) | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.043 | 19.05ª | 1 | < .0001 |
Model 4 neither lagged effect | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.044 | Â | Â | Â |
no lagged effect of unemployment: compared to Model 2 | Â | Â | Â | 32.54 | 1 | < .0001 |
no lagged effect of MHI-5 : compared to Model 3 | Â | Â | Â | 50.63 | 1 | < .0001 |