Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of body psychotherapy in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia – a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

  • Stefan Priebe1Email author,
  • Mark Savill1,
  • Ulrich Reininghaus2,
  • Til Wykes2,
  • Richard Bentall3,
  • Christoph Lauber3,
  • Paul McCrone4,
  • Frank Röhricht1 and
  • Sandra Eldridge5
BMC Psychiatry201313:26

Received: 24 October 2012

Accepted: 3 January 2013

Published: 14 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
24 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Priebe
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
14 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-13-26

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, Newham Centre for Mental Health
Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London
Department of Psychiatry, University of Liverpool
King's College London, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry
Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London