Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Greater incidence of depression with hypnotic use than with placebo

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Nov 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Kripke
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Kripke
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ripu Jindal
11 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malcolm Lader
11 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Smith
12 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rafael Pelayo
23 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Kripke
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ripu Jindal
22 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Smith
23 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malcolm Lader
15 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rafael Pelayo
24 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Kripke
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Kripke
Resubmission - Version 7
13 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
21 Aug 2007 Editorially accepted
21 Aug 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-7-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement