Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationship between cluster frequency and diagnosisa for two cohortsb of selected multiple visit patients.

From: An examination of the temporal and geographical patterns of psychiatric emergency service use by multiple visit patients as a means for their early detection

 

Personality disorders

Bipolar disorders

Subs. abuse disorders

Schizophrenia

Other disorders

Patientsc (visits)

Cohort

a

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

a

b

No clusters

31

21d

71

30

40

14

131

75

24

9

297

149

 

(341)

(453)

(840)

(619)

(458)

(262)

(1687)

(1519)

(250)

(152)

(3576)

(3005)

1 to 3 clusters

50

17

31

5

38

12

63

24

24

4

206

62

 

(875)

(473)

(535)

(111)

(499)

(281)

(1101)

(772)

(303)

(79)

(3313)

(1716)

≥ 4 clusters

14

9

3

2

7

1

23

8

1

0

48

20

 

(771)

(603)

(179)

(149)

(180)

(29)

(1106)

(500)

(26)

0

(2262)

(1281)

Total patients

95

47

105

37

85

27

217

107

49

13

551

231

(Total visits)

(1987)

(1529)

(1554)

(879)

(1137)

(572)

(3894)

(2791)

(579)

(231)

(9151)

(6002)

  1. a Other = adjustment disorders, depression, anxiety disorders, organic mental disorders, psychosis not otherwise specified, paranoid psychoses.
  2. b Cohort a = repeating clusters (4 visits in 3 months) in patients with 8 or more visits taken from the intermediate and heavy user groups. Cohort b = repeating clusters (7 visits in 6 months) in patients with 14 or more visits taken from the heavy user group.
  3. c N values = 551 (of the 631 cohort a patients) and 231 (of the 247 cohort b patients) are patients that had a clear diagnosis.
  4. d The numbers above the parentheses represent the patient count, the numbers in the parenthesis represent the corresponding number of visits.