Skip to main content

Table 1 Discrimination Effectiveness for the PANSS Items

From: Item response analysis of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

Item

Content

Summary Evaluation

3 Factor Subscales

Criterion A

Criterion B

Criterion C

Criterion D

1.

Delusions

Very good

Positive

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

2.

Conceptual Disorganization

Very good

Positive

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

3.

Hallucinatory Behavior

Very good

Positive

4

Some

Yes

Yes

4.

Excitement

Good

Positive

6

Yes

Yes

No

5.

Grandiosity

Good

Positive

4

Some

Yes

Yes

6.

Suspiciousness/Persecution

Very good

Positive

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

7.

Hostility

Poor

Positive

6

Yes

Yes

No

8.

Blunted Affect

Very good

Negative

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

9.

Emotional Withdrawal

Very good

Negative

7

Yes

Yes

Yes

10.

Poor Rapport

Good

Negative

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

11.

Passive Apathetic Social Withdrawal

Very good

Negative

7

Yes

Yes

Yes

12.

Difficulty in Abstract Thinking

Poor

Negative

6

Some

Some

Yes

13.

Lack of Spontaneity Conversation

Very good

Negative

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

14.

Stereotyped Thinking

Poor

Negative

6

No

Some

Yes

15.

Somatic Concern

Poor

General

4

No

Some

No

16.

Anxiety

Good

General

5

Yes

Yes

No

17.

Guilt Feelings

Good

General

5

Some

Yes

No

18.

Tension

Good

General

5

No

Yes

Yes

19.

Mannerisms and Posturing

Poor

General

6

Some

Yes

Yes

20.

Depression

Poor

General

5

Yes

Yes

No

21.

Motor Retardation

Good

General

5

Yes

Yes

No

22.

Uncooperative

Good

General

6

Yes

Yes

No

23.

Unusual Thought Content

Poor

General

6

Yes

Yes

No

24.

Disorientation

Poor

General

4

No

No

No

25.

Poor Attention

Poor

General

5

Yes

Yes

Yes

26.

Lack of Judgment and Insight

Poor

General

5

Some

Some

Yes

27.

Disturbance of Volition

Poor

General

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

28.

Poor Impulse Control

Good

General

6

Yes

Yes

No

29.

Preoccupation

Poor

General

5

Some

No

Yes

30.

Active Social Avoidance

Very good

General

6

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. Criterion A: Number of options for which there was some range of symptom severity in which the question was more likely to be endorsed than all other options.
  2. Criterion B: Extent to which option characteristic curves increased rapidly with changes in overall severity.
  3. Criterion C: Does the severity region in which each option was most likely to be endorsed correspond to option weights?
  4. Criterion D: Do options for an item span the full continuum of severity from -3 to +3?