Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation of patients on sertindole treatment after failure of other antipsychotics: A retrospective analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 May 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicholas Moore
6 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Siegfried Kasper
28 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - Susana Murteira
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicholas Moore
7 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Siegfried Kasper
20 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Susana Murteira
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Susana Murteira
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Susana Murteira
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Susana Murteira
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
14 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
14 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-244X-8-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement