This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Predictors of depression stigma
© Griffiths et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 17 April 2007
Accepted: 18 April 2008
Published: 18 April 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Apr 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cheng-Fang Yen|
|17 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lefteris Lykouras|
|10 Aug 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Kathleen Griffiths|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Aug 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cheng-Fang Yen|
|24 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Kathleen Griffiths|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Kathleen Griffiths|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Apr 2008||Editorially accepted|
|18 Apr 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-8-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.