Relaxation training for anxiety: a ten-years systematic review with meta-analysis
© Manzoni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 07 January 2008
Accepted: 02 June 2008
Published: 02 June 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Jan 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Norton|
|11 Feb 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victor Sierpina|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Norton|
|9 Apr 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Gian Mauro Manzoni|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Apr 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Gian Mauro Manzoni|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Jun 2008||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jun 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-244X-8-41|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.