Skip to main content

Table 1 Previous articles concerning the validity of the SCOFF:

From: Validation of the Finnish version of the SCOFF questionnaire among young adults aged 20 to 35 years

Article

Population

Number of cases

Diagnostic procedure

Sensitivity (Threshold ≥2)

%

Specificity

%

PPV

%

NPV

%

The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for EDs

Morgan, J 1999

Cases: Women confirmed as having anorexia or bulimia nervosa

Controls: University students confirmed as not having an ED

116

96

total 214

SCOFF vs. clinical diagnosis based on DSM-IV* criteria

100

87.5

-

-

The SCOFF questionnaire and clinical interview for EDs in general practice: comparative study

Luck, A 2002

Women attending two general practices in London

341

SCOFF vs. clinical diagnosis based on DSM-IV criteria

84.6

89.6

24.4

99.3

Validation of SCOFF questionnaire among pre-teenagers

Caamaño, F 2002

One class of pre-teenagers selected randomly from 10 Spanish schools

289

SCOFF vs. EAT**

64.1

87.2

43.9

94.0

Four simple questions can help screen for EDs

Cotton, M-A 2003

College students and patients from primary care clinics in London

129

104

total 233

SCOFF and ESP*** vs. Q-EDD**** (based on DSM-IV criteria)

78

88

-

-

Application of the SCOFF, EAT and TFEQ questionnaires in women seeking diet-therapy

Siervo, M 2005

Women seeking diet-therapy at the outpatient dietetic clinic in Naples

Remark: Only patients with BED, bulimic EDNOS or normal eating behaviour were selected in the study.

162

SCOFF, EAT and TFEQ***** vs. clinical diagnosis based on DSM-IV criteria

94

21

-

-

Eating Disorders in Graduate Students: Exploring the SCOFF as a simple screening tool

Parker, S 2005

Graduate students attending the university student health clinic

297

SCOFF vs. EDE-Q ******

53.3

93.2

66.7

88.7

Validation of the SCOFF questionnaire for screening the eating behaviour disorders of adolescents in school

Rueda, G 2005

Randomly selected students from three schools in Colombia

241

SCOFF vs. CIDI******* (based on DSM-IV criteria)

81.9

78.7

62.1

91.1

Validation of the SCOFF for screening of EDs in university women

Rueda, G 2005

University students in Colombia

385

SCOFF vs. CIDI (based on DSM-IV criteria)

78.4

75.8

46.5

92.9

Validation of the Spanish version of the SCOFF questionnaire for the screening of EDs in primary care

Garcia-Campayo, J 2005

Patient with probable eating disorder diagnosis from six primary health care centers in Spain.

203

SCOFF vs. SCAN******** (based on DSM-IV criteria)

97.7

94.4

81

93.1

Screening for EDs in primary care: EDE-Q versus SCOFF

Mond, J 2008

Women aged 18–40 years attending two primary care practices in smaller urban regions of the USA

147

SCOFF and EDE-Q vs. telephone interview including diagnostic items of the EDE*********

72

73

35

-

  1. *Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition
  2. **Eating Attitude Test
  3. ***Eating disorder Screen for Primary care
  4. ****Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses
  5. *****Three Factor Eating Questionnaire
  6. ******Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire
  7. *******Composite International Diagnostic Interview
  8. ********Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry
  9. ********* Eating Disorder Examination interview