Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of patients included in the AMP feasibility study: elders sample

From: Development and evaluation of culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions for under-served people in primary care

  

Wellbeing intervention n = 23

Usual care n = 14

Total n = 37

Sex

Male

6 (26.1%)

3 (21.4%)

9 (24.3%)

Female

17 (73.9%)

11 (78.6%)

28 (75.7%)

Age mean (sd) range

65.64 (10.29) 50-84

60.70 (8.16) 53-78

63.77 (9.73) 50-84

Ethnicity

White British

20 (87.0%)

13 (92.9%)

33 (89.2%)

White other

2 (8.7%)

1 (7.1%)

3 (8.1%)

Mixed

1 (4.3%)

 

1 (2.7%)

Engaged in community activities

Yes

3 (13.0%)

6 (42.9%)

9 (24.3%)

No

20 (87.0%)

8 (57.1%)

28 (75.7%)

Baseline measures 1 mean (sd)

PHQ92

17.70 (5.14)

19.00 (5.35)

18.19 (5.19)

 

GAD7

15.91 (4.31)

13.20 (6.12)

14.88 (5.16)

 

WSAS

26.00 (9.48)

22.86 (13.35)

24.81 (11.03)

 

EQ5D

0.29 (0.36)

0.31 (0.45)

0.30 (0.39)

 

EQ5D health state (0–100)

44.65 (19.59)

53.93 (25.81)

48.16 (22.27)

 

CORE-OM (mean × 10)3

19.85 (6.72)

20.00 (6.90)

19.91 (6.69)

  1. 1All health scales are scored so that a high score is indicative of poor health, apart from EQ5D.
  2. 2PHQ9 scores of 10+ are usually indicative of clinically significant depression, and scores of >20 more severe major depression.
  3. 3CORE-OM scores of 25 are usually considered indicative of severe distress.