Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Atypical antipsychotic augmentation in SSRI treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • David Veale1, 4Email author,
  • Sarah Miles1,
  • Nicola Smallcombe2,
  • Haben Ghezai1,
  • Ben Goldacre3 and
  • John Hodsoll1
BMC Psychiatry201414:317

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0317-5

Received: 21 May 2014

Accepted: 24 October 2014

Published: 29 November 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 May 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ragy Girgis
6 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Kantrowitz
14 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - David Veale
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Kantrowitz
14 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - David Veale
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 Oct 2014 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12888-014-0317-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
(2)
Kings College London Medical School, London, UK
(3)
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
(4)
Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma, The Maudsley Hospital, London, UK

Advertisement