| Item | Responses | Risk score |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Current intervention focuses on neglect | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 1 |
2. | Number of prior interventions, investigations or reports (for neglect) | None | 0 |
 |  | One or more (general) | 1 |
 |  | One or more for neglect | 2 |
3. | Current intervention focuses on abuse | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 1 |
4. | Number of prior interventions, reports investigations (for abuse) | None | 0 |
 |  | One | 1 |
 |  | Two or more | 2 |
4. | Prior injury to a child resulting from child abuse or neglect | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 1 |
5. | Primary caretaker’s assessment of incident | Not applicable | 0 |
 |  | The fault lay with the child | 1 |
5. | Primary caretaker provides physical care inconsistent with child’s needs | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 1 |
6. | Primary caretaker has a current drug problem | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 1 |
7. | Domestic violence in household in the past year | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 2 |
8. | Primary caretaker characteristics | Overly strict with the child | 1 |
 |  | Very dominant | 1 |
9. | The family has financial problems | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 1 |
10. | Primary caretaker is involved in destructive relationships | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes, but not as a victim of domestic violence | 1 |
 |  | Yes, as a victim of domestic violence | 2 |
9. | Activities to improve parenting skills | Performs all agreed actions | 0 |
 |  | Performs only some agreed actions | 1 |
 |  | Performs practically no agreed actions | 2 |
 |  | Not to be determined | 1 |
10. | Participation to the intervention: primary caretaker cancels appointments/is not present at appointments | Never without a good reason | 0 |
 |  | Once | 1 |
 |  | More than once | 2 |
 |  | Not to be determined | 1 |
11. | Primary caretaker believes that the parenting problems are less severe than indicated by the professional | No | 0 |
 |  | Yes | 1 |
 | Maximum points |  | 18 |