Skip to content


  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Developing a clinical translational neuroscience taxonomy for anxiety and mood disorder: protocol for the baseline-follow up Research domain criteria Anxiety and Depression (“RAD”) project

  • Leanne M. Williams1, 2Email author,
  • Andrea N. Goldstein-Piekarski1, 2,
  • Nowreen Chowdhry1, 2,
  • Katherine A. Grisanzio1, 2,
  • Nancy A. Haug1, 3,
  • Zoe Samara1,
  • Amit Etkin1, 2,
  • Ruth O’Hara1, 2,
  • Alan F. Schatzberg1,
  • Trisha Suppes1, 4 and
  • Jerome Yesavage1, 2
Contributed equally
BMC PsychiatryBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:68

Received: 30 January 2016

Accepted: 8 March 2016

Published: 15 March 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
30 Jan 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Mar 2016 Editorially accepted
15 Mar 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12888-016-0771-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
Sierra-Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, USA
Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, USA
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, USA