- Study protocol
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Developing a clinical translational neuroscience taxonomy for anxiety and mood disorder: protocol for the baseline-follow up Research domain criteria Anxiety and Depression (“RAD”) project
- Leanne M. Williams1, 2Email author,
- Andrea N. Goldstein-Piekarski†1, 2,
- Nowreen Chowdhry†1, 2,
- Katherine A. Grisanzio†1, 2,
- Nancy A. Haug†1, 3,
- Zoe Samara†1,
- Amit Etkin†1, 2,
- Ruth O’Hara†1, 2,
- Alan F. Schatzberg†1,
- Trisha Suppes†1, 4 and
- Jerome Yesavage†1, 2
© Williams et al. 2016
Received: 30 January 2016
Accepted: 8 March 2016
Published: 15 March 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Jan 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Author responded||Author comments|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|15 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12888-016-0771-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.