Skip to main content

Table 6 Thresholds for the three possible factors of the PHQ-15 based on IRT analysis

From: Validation of the Chinese version of the PHQ-15 in a tertiary hospital

 

Diff.

Coef.

Std. Err.

z

P > z

[95 % Conf.

Interval]

Factor 1

 Item 2

1 vs 0

0.351

0.064

5.49

<0.001

0.226

0.477

 

2 vs 1

2.094

0.114

18.31

<0.001

1.870

2.318

 Item 3

1 vs 0

0.320

0.065

4.92

<0.001

0.193

0.448

 

2 vs 1

1.577

0.095

16.52

<0.001

1.390

1.764

 Item 4

1 vs 0

2.590

0.126

20.50

<0.001

2.342

2.838

 

2 vs 1

2.685

0.237

11.32

<0.001

2.220

3.150

 Item 5

1 vs 0

0.792

0.068

11.58

<0.001

0.658

0.926

 

2 vs 1

2.567

0.145

17.71

<0.001

2.282

2.851

 Item 6

1 vs 0

0.734

0.068

10.85

<0.001

0.602

0.867

 

2 vs 1

2.427

0.136

17.83

<0.001

2.160

2.693

 Item 7

1 vs 0

0.385

0.064

6.09

<0.001

0.261

0.509

 

2 vs 1

2.684

0.144

18.61

<0.001

2.401

2.966

 Item 8

1 vs 0

1.910

0.099

19.38

<0.001

1.716

2.103

 

2 vs 1

2.277

0.164

13.90

<0.001

1.956

2.598

 Item 11

1 vs 0

1.849

0.096

19.19

<0.001

1.661

2.038

 

2 vs 1

2.292

0.162

14.14

<0.001

1.975

2.610

Factor 2

 Item 9

1 vs 0

0.366

0.040

9.16

<0.001

0.288

0.445

 

2 vs 1

1.872

0.080

23.43

<0.001

1.715

2.029

 Item 10

1 vs 0

0.558

0.042

13.18

<0.001

0.475

0.641

 

2 vs 1

1.641

0.070

23.30

<0.001

1.503

1.779

Factor 3

 Item 1

1 vs 0

0.867

0.063

13.80

<0.001

0.745

0.992

 

2 vs 1

2.052

0.112

18.37

<0.001

1.833

2.271

 Item 12

1 vs 0

0.122

0.055

2.21

0.027

0.014

0.230

 

2 vs 1

1.737

0.089

19.42

<0.001

1.561

1.912

 Item 13

1 vs 0

0.152

0.055

2.76

0.006

0.044

0.260

 

2 vs 1

1.831

0.093

19.67

<0.001

1.649

2.014

 Item 14

1 vs 0

−0.469

0.057

−8.18

<0.001

−0.581

−0.357

 

2 vs 1

1.598

0.081

19.64

<0.001

1.439

1.758

 Item 15

1 vs 0

−0.118

0.056

−2.10

0.035

−0.228

0.008

 

2 vs 1

1.329

0.075

17.62

<0.001

1.181

1.477

  1. Partial credit model, number of observations = 1329
  2. Factor 1: Log likelihood = −7025.6965; AIC = 14085.390; BIC = 14173.660
  3. Factor 2: Log likelihood = −1942.3235; AIC = 3894.647; BIC = 3920.608
  4. Factor 3: Log likelihood = −5613.5482; AIC = 11249.100; BIC = 11306.210